GeneralNewsProduct NewsRebooting with Virginia Tech’s Bicycle Helmet Ratings

FasterSkier FasterSkierAugust 5, 2020
Rosie Brennan (in yellow) takes the lead while Sadie Bjornsen (in pink helmet) coaches on the bike during a 2017 U.S. women’s team camp in the Methow Valley. (Photo: Matt Whitcomb)

Last year, we ran a story on Virginia Tech’s Bicycle Helmet Ratings titled: Every day is Safety Day.

That much remains true, every day is safety day. With some medical systems around the country stressed with obvious fall out from the pandemic, we thought it wise to republish parts of the piece we ran last year. Virginia Tech presents a methodical process to determine the safest bike helmets. Although the testing is not specific to rollerskiing, it does provide an excellent approximation of the forces rollerskiers may experience in the event of a fall.

If you are in the market for a new brain bucket, the VT list is a great place to start and read up on how the helmets are evaluated for safety. Remember this when reviewing the VT list of helmets: “A lower score offers better protection.”

 

***

 

Since 2011, the Virginia Tech Helmet Lab has been rating helmets. They began with football helmets and have branched into ice hockey, baseball, softball, and soccer headgear. A few years back, the lab began publishing its findings on bicycle helmets.

In conjunction with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the lab uses what it calls the STAR evaluation system to collect its data.

“Our bicycle helmet impact tests evaluate a helmet’s ability to reduce linear acceleration and rotational velocity of the head resulting from a range of impacts a cyclist might experience,” states the Virginia Tech Bicycle Helmet rating webpage. “Helmets with more stars provide a reduction in concussion risk for these impacts compared to helmets with less stars.”

The protection ratings use a 1-5 star system and a numerical score in determining a helmet’s capacity to reduce concussion risk. Readers should note that the rating website states the following when considering the numerical score: “A lower score offers better protection.”

For example, the best scoring helmet received a 10.5, whereas the lowest scoring helmet received a 25.5 score.

Impact locations from STAR methodology.

According to the STAR methodology, 12 different “impact conditions are evaluated” on each helmet. The conditions include six different impact locations with each location exposed to two different impact velocities.

Impact configurations from STAR methodology.

Rollerskiing offers a set of risk that involve speeding downhill, road debris, traffic to name a few. Accidents happen. If you are in the market place for a new helmet, the VT resource is a good starting point for research. And if the helmet of your choice comes in a hi-vis color, that’s a bonus too.

 

 

FasterSkier

FasterSkier

Loading Facebook Comments ...