- The Administration or reintroduction of any quantity of autologous, allogenic (homologous) or heterologous blood, or red blood cell products of any origin into the circulatory system.
- Artificially enhancing the uptake, transport or delivery of oxygen.
Including, but not limited to:
Perfluorochemicals; efaproxiral (RSR13) and modified haemoglobin products, e.g. haemoglobin-based blood substitutes and microencapsulated haemoglobin products, excluding supplemental oxygen by inhalation.
- Any form of intravascular manipulation of the blood or blood components by physical or chemical means.
Blood transfusions or infusions, which are prohibited methods, would not be detected using current analytical testing. This was not addressed in the press conference.
The team did, however, claim that their rights had been violated by the search and questioning.
“While we completely support the right of the Austrian authorities and the International Biathlon Union to rigorously pursue all anti-doping detection procedures, this has been conducted based on international recognized standards of fair treatment, and the presumption of innocence,” Kryukov said. “Such procedures are clearly outlined in the WADA Code of Conduct. Therefore, it is with regret that [we] believe such procedures have been ignored in this investigation, and that the Kazakhstani athletes have had their fundamental rights abused.”
Galina Vishnevskaya, the athlete representative for the Kazakhstan team, said that the investigation had begun around 8 p.m. on February 8th, and some athletes had been detained for questioning until 5 a.m. Furthermore, she complained that because their phones and laptops were taken as part of the search, they could not contact anyone “for help”. The investigation has prevented athletes from communicating with their families in the following week, she continued, and they had not been told when their possessions would be returned.
She additionally alleged that her coach, who has heart problems, had been treated “roughly”.
While the WADA International Standard for Testing and Investigations stipulates that athletes must be treated fairly, it is not clear what the Kazakhs’ specific allegation is regarding which provisions are violated.
The relevant sections of the International Standard are as follows:
“The Anti- Doping Organization shall ensure that investigations are conducted fairly, objectively and impartially at all times. The conduct of investigations, the evaluation of information and evidence identified in the course of that investigation, and the outcome of the investigation, shall be fully documented… The Anti-Doping Organization should make use of all investigative resources reasonably available to it to conduct its investigation. This may include obtaining information and assistance from law enforcement and other relevant authorities, including other regulators.”
Additionally, doping is a criminal offense in Austria — unlike many other countries — thus is is not only the guidelines of general anti-doping procedures which must be followed.
“The investigators are currently assessing whether Austrian federal anti-doping laws have been violated, and whether this is a case of sport fraud [Sportsbetrug] as defined in the Austrian Criminal Code,” the Austrian police wrote in a statement on February 8. “Austrian Minister of the Interior, Wolfgang Sobotka, thanked the 30 police officers for their hard work, and the NADA Austria and the IBU for their positive collaboration: ‘The Austrian police will be going to great lengths to clarify the issue of criminal liability.'”
Furthermore, the seizure of athletes’ phones and laptops appears to be related to this provision of WADA’s International Standard:
“Investigations should not be conducted with a closed mind, pursuing only one outcome (e.g., institution of anti-doping rule violation proceedings against an Athlete or other Person). Rather, the investigator(s) should be open to and should consider all possible outcomes at each key stage of the investigation, and should seek to gather not only any available evidence indicating that there is a case to answer but also any available evidence indicating that there is no case to answer.”
The full investigation of materials collected from the raid is slated to take several weeks.