This coverage is made possible through the generous support of Marty and Kathy Hall and A Hall Mark of Excellence Award. To learn more about A Hall Mark of Excellence Award, or to learn how you can support FasterSkier’s coverage, please contact info@fasterskier.com.
Davos doesn’t reward urgency.
It tolerates it, sometimes — lets it flirt with the clock through the opening kilometers — but it never forgets. Like a mysterious, wispy cloud, the altitude sits quietly above the stadium, thinning the air just enough that the consequences arrive late, not immediately. The first lap can feel generous. The second is where Davos asks what you’ve really brought with you.
On Sunday, in the men’s 10-kilometer freestyle interval start at the World Cup in Davos, Switzerland, that truth arrived right on schedule. Athletes who attacked early were gradually called back. Athletes who waited found themselves moving forward without ever appearing to accelerate. And one skier — patient, smooth, and increasingly inevitable — turned the second lap into a private demonstration.
Einar Hedegart of Norway won in 22:40.7, earning his second straight World Cup victory, this one built not on surprise but on control. Behind him came Harald Østberg Amundsen (NOR) at +11.7 seconds, Mattis Stenshagen (NOR) at +18.8, Johannes Høsflot Klæbo (NOR) fourth (+24.1), and Martin Løwstrøm Nyenget (NOR) fifth (+30.6). Andrew Musgrave (GBR) led the non-Norwegians in sixth (+31.1).
Five Norwegians in the top five — but only one skied the race the way Davos prefers.

The Temptation of the First Lap
Interval starts strip racing down to decisions. No drafting. No cover. No negotiation. In Davos, those decisions begin almost immediately because the course invites speed from the start. The opening kilometers flow. The snow was hard and fast after an overnight freeze. Skis hummed. Breathing felt manageable.
Several athletes took the invitation.
Early time checks were brisk, and for a moment the race appeared to be tilting toward the skiers willing to press from the gun. Harald Østberg Amundsen, the reigning overall World Cup champion, was among them — assertive, controlled, but unmistakably on the front foot. At the first major checkpoint, Amundsen held a small advantage over Hedegart, exactly the kind of margin that feels reassuring on paper.
Others followed similar scripts. Strong starters carved seconds in the opening loop, skiing as if Davos were simply another mid-altitude venue rather than one of the circuit’s quiet physiological traps. It all looked reasonable — until the course turned upward again.
Why Davos Punishes Impatience
At roughly 1,560 meters above sea level, Davos sits just high enough to distort pacing instincts. Red-lining a climb here doesn’t always feel catastrophic in the moment. The cost arrives later, when recovery never quite comes, and the second lap begins to feel longer than the first.
That dynamic defined the race.
Athletes who went hard early found themselves defending, not attacking, once the second lap began. Speed leaked away on the longer climbs. Transitions dulled. The ability to change gears — so critical in freestyle skating — started to fade.
Hedegart, meanwhile, was doing something else entirely.

Hedegart’s Patience — and the Moment it Mattered
Hedegart did not lead early.
That point matters.
He allowed seconds to slip away in the first lap, skiing smoothly but without urgency, keeping his effort under control on the steepest sections. At altitude, that restraint isn’t passive — it’s strategic. Backing off even a few percent on the climbs can preserve a system that stays responsive later.
When the race entered the second lap, the difference became apparent.
Hedegart didn’t surge so much as continue. While others plateaued, he maintained tempo. While early leaders fought to hold speed, he quietly increased his advantage, taking time not through dramatic accelerations but through the absence of slowdown.
By the 7.4-kilometer mark, the race had clarified. The seconds Hedegart had conceded early were gone — and then some. His advantage over Amundsen had grown decisively. The course was no longer offering second chances.
The finish confirmed what the splits already suggested: Hedegart’s second lap was the fastest in the field, and it wasn’t close.

Amundsen, Stenshagen, and the Norwegian Sorting Hat
Behind Hedegart, the Norwegian internal race unfolded in layers.
Amundsen’s early aggression kept him close, but the cost was unavoidable. He remained solid — this was not a collapse — yet the final kilometers belonged to Hedegart. What had been a narrow early lead turned into an 11.7-second deficit at the line.
Mattis Stenshagen, by contrast, skied one of the day’s most even races. Never flashy, never panicked, he moved steadily forward as others drifted back, finishing third and reinforcing his reputation as one of Norway’s most reliable distance technicians.
Johannes Høsflot Klæbo offered another useful case study. After a frustrating sprint the day before, Klæbo looked sharper and more composed, staying in contention through the middle of the race. But Davos demands distance-specific economy, not just efficiency, and he lost ground late, finishing fourth — competitive, but never truly threatening Hedegart.
Martin Løwstrøm Nyenget, wearing the red distance bib, rounded out the Norwegian sweep of the top five, steady as ever but unable to match the winning pace in the final lap.
Five Norwegians, five slightly different races — and one clear template emerging at the top.

The International Picture: Holding On vs. Moving Up
Outside Norway, the same altitude logic applied.
Andrew Musgrave (GBR) skied a disciplined race, managing his effort well enough to stay competitive throughout. He was rewarded with sixth place — not by attacking late, but by avoiding the fade that claimed others. In Davos, survival is often the first victory.
France’s Mathis Desloges and Hugo Lapalus hovered near the top ten, their early speed gradually neutralized by the second lap. Italy’s Federico Pellegrino, so dangerous in sprint formats, found the sustained demands of the 10 km Interval Start less forgiving, finishing outside the top 30.
The pattern repeated down the results list: strong early checkpoints followed by diminishing returns. Davos was collecting its debts.

The American View: Learning in Familiar Air
For the U.S. team, John Steel Hagenbuch finished 30th, the top American on the day — a result that only hints at how complicated his Davos race really was.
Hagenbuch has never considered himself particularly sensitive to altitude, a fact that quietly shaped both his expectations and his pacing plan.
“I’m maybe not the best authority to say how altitude feels, as I usually don’t feel affected by it much,” Hagenbuch said. “I typically start slow and then pick up speed through races, and this pacing strategy is typically rewarded at altitude.”
That approach aligned neatly with what Davos demanded. And while Hagenbuch is quick to downplay any physiological advantage from growing up and training in Sun Valley, Idaho, he did note a different kind of familiarity.
“I think being from altitude can help with racing at altitude, but it’s certainly not a decisively significant factor — I was still plenty far behind the sea-level Norwegians today,” he said, with a laugh. “Speaking of familiarity, however, I remarked at how much Davos reminded me of home — the trails and the surrounding mountains strongly resemble Galena.”
The race itself marked his best feeling of the opening World Cup block — even if the result came under less-than-ideal circumstances.
“This Davos Skate 10 km was the best I’ve felt so far in Period 1,” Hagenbuch said. “But it unfortunately came only a day after I crashed hard on the infamously icy slalom downhill coming down from Flüelapass and subluxed my right shoulder for about the tenth time.”
By race morning, the pain hadn’t gone away.
“Even with a few thousand milligrams of acetaminophen down the hatch, every single pole stroke hurt,” he said. “So while it was nice to finally — barely — be top 30, I can’t help but think that without the injury and the stress associated with it, I could have done better. Alas, that’s life, and that’s skiing. I am not the only one to have had some bad luck in important races.”
Zooming out, Hagenbuch remains confident in his trajectory, even if the opening block didn’t fully reflect it.
“I feel confident in what I can achieve this winter — even if I didn’t necessarily show it during Period 1,” he said. “With this being an Olympic year, the competition was even higher than normal. For example, Per-Erik Bjornestad, one of our Norwegian wax techs, said that the Trondheim 10 km skate was the highest level of skiing he had ever witnessed.”
Looking ahead, Hagenbuch’s plans are clear — and pragmatic.
“Pretty much regardless of how today’s race went, I was going to go home to Sun Valley for Christmas,” he said. “I don’t think it makes sense for me to do the Tour de Ski, given how my health has been this fall and the start of the winter. I’m excited to go home and to compete at U.S. Nationals in Lake Placid.”

Why this Race Matters More than it Looks
It’s easy to treat Davos as an outlier — scenic, elevated, a little unique. The athletes don’t.
The men’s 10 km Freestyle Interval Start is an Olympic format. It’s a race without shelter, without drafting, and without excuses. Davos amplifies all of that. Pacing errors are magnified. Aerobic limits are exposed. The second lap becomes a referendum.
Hedegart passed that referendum emphatically.
This was not a perfect-day fluke. It was not a tactical accident. It was the same pattern, repeated under different conditions, at a different altitude, against the deepest field in the sport. Ski patiently. Protect the climbs. Let others make the race hard early — then make it impossible late.

A Quiet Finish, a Louder Message
There was no spectacle at the finish line. No disbelief. No chaos. Hedegart crossed, collapsed, and recovered — another man undone by thin air, but this time by his own effort.
Two races. Two wins. Two second laps that separated him from everyone else.
Davos didn’t raise its voice. It didn’t have to.
It simply told the truth — the same one it always tells — and this time, Einar Hedegart listened better than anyone else.
Men’s 10 k Individual Start Freestyle RESULTS

Love Stories Like This? Help Keep Them Coming.
Feature stories like this one take time, access, and care to produce. If you value thoughtful storytelling and independent ski journalism, please consider becoming a Voluntary Subscriber. Your support directly fuels the work we do to cover the people, places, and moments that make our sport special.
Join the FasterSkier community!

- altitude racing
- Andrew Musgrave
- Cross Country Skiing World Cup
- Davos altitude
- Davos Nordic
- Davos World Cup
- Einar Hedegart
- FasterSkier Race Report
- FIS Cross Country World Cup
- freestyle interval start
- Harald Østberg Amundsen
- high-altitude skiing
- Johannes Høsflot Klæbo
- John Steel Hagenbuch
- Martin Løwstrøm Nyenget
- Matt Whitcomb
- Mattis Stenshagen
- Men’s 10 km freestyle
- men’s distance race
- men’s distance skiing
- Nordic skiing analysis
- Norway cross country skiing
- Olympic distance format
- pacing strategy skiing
- U.S. cross-country skiing
- World Cup race report
Matthew Voisin
As owner and publisher of FasterSkier, Matthew Voisin manages the day-to-day operations, content, and partnerships that keep the site gliding smoothly. Away from the desk, he’s doing his best to keep pace with his two energetic sons.



